LIQUID ALUMINUM SULFATE ANTITRUST LITIGATION USALCO, SII AND AMERICAN SECURITIES DIRECT PURCHASER SETTLEMENT

Case No. 16-MD-2687 (JLL) (JAD)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Frequently Asked Questions

  1. BASIC INFORMATION

  2. WHY DID I GET THE NOTICE?

    The Court has directed the Notice because as potential class members of the Direct Purchaser Settlement Class, you have the right to know about the Settlement reached in this Action between the Direct Purchaser Class Plaintiffs, on behalf of the Direct Purchaser Settlement Class, and the USALCO, SII, and American Securities Settling Parties (as defined on the Home Page and in the Settlement Agreements), and about all of the options before the Court decides whether to approve the Settlement. The Notice explains the lawsuit, the Settlement, and Class Members' legal rights.

    The Court in charge of this Action is the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey. The case is called In Re: Liquid Aluminum Sulfate Antitrust Litigation, Civil Action No. 16-md-2687 (JLL) (JAD). United States District Court Judge Jose L. Linares is overseeing this Action. The entities who brought this case are the Plaintiffs, and the companies and individuals they sued are called Defendants.

  3. WHAT IS THIS LAWSUIT ABOUT?

    The Direct Purchaser Class Plaintiffs claim that the USALCO, SII and American Securities Settling Parties participated in a conspiracy – with other Defendants in the Action and unnamed co-conspirators – to allocate territories and/or not to compete for each other’s historical business by rigging bids, allocating customers and fixing, stabilizing, and maintaining the price of Alum sold in the United States from January 1, 1997 to at least February 28, 2011 in violation of the federal antitrust laws. The Direct Purchaser Class Plaintiffs allege that the claimed anticompetitive conduct resulted in artificially inflated prices for Alum. The USALCO, SII and American Securities Settling Parties deny all of these claims and have asserted various defenses to the claims. The Court has not made any decision as to the merits of Direct Purchaser Class Plaintiffs’ allegations.

    Please Note: These Settlements are a partial settlement of the Action. The Settlements do not release any claims of the Direct Purchaser Class Plaintiffs and the other members of the Direct Purchaser Settlement Class against any other Defendant in the Action and litigation against those Defendants is ongoing.

  4. WHO ARE THE SETTLING DEFENDANTS?

    The Settling Defendants are USALCO LLC (“USALCO”), Southern Ionics Incorporated (“SII”) and American Securities LLC (“American Securities”).

  5. WHY IS THIS A CLASS ACTION?

    In a class action, one or more individuals or entities, called “class representatives,” sue on behalf of others who have similar claims. The class representatives in this case are Central Arkansas Water; City of Charlotte, North Carolina; City and County of Denver, Colorado, acting by and through its board of Water Commissioners; Flambeau River Papers, LLC; City of Greensboro, North Carolina; Mobile Area Water and Sewer System; City of Rochester, Minnesota; City of Sacramento, California; SUEZ Water Environmental Services Inc.; SUEZ Water New Jersey Inc.; SUEZ Water Princeton Meadows Inc.; SUEZ Water New York Inc.; SUEZ Water Pennsylvania Inc.; and City of Texarkana, Arkansas and City of Texarkana, Texas, d/b/a Texarkana Water Utilities (collectively referred to as “Direct Purchaser Class Plaintiffs”). The Direct Purchaser Class Plaintiffs and the individuals or entities with similar claims are individually “class members,” together comprising a class. One court resolves the issues for all class members, except for those who exclude themselves from the class.

  6. WHY ARE THERE SETTLEMENTS OF THIS ACTION WITH USALCO, SII, AND AMERICAN SECURITIES?

    USALCO, SII, and American Securities have denied all liability and wrongdoing in this case and have asserted various defenses to the Direct Purchaser Class Plaintiffs’ claims. The Court did not decide in favor of the Direct Purchaser Class Plaintiffs or USALCO, SII, and American Securities. Instead, both sides agreed to the Settlement. That way, they avoid the cost and risk of a trial, and the Direct Purchaser Settlement Class Members affected will get compensation.

    This Settlement is the product of extensive negotiations between lawyers for the Direct Purchaser Class Plaintiffs and and USALCO, between lawyers for the Direct Purchaser Class Plaintiffs and SII, and between lawyers for the Direct Purchaser Class Plaintiffs and American Securities. The Direct Purchaser Class Plaintiffs and Interim DPP Lead Counsel think the Settlement is fair and in the best interests of all Direct Purchaser Settlement Class Members.

  7. WHO IS AFFECTED BY THE SETTLEMENT

    To see if you are affected by the Settlement, you first have to determine if you are a Direct Purchaser Settlement Class Member.

  8. WHO IS INCLUDED IN THE DIRECT PURCHASER SETTLEMENT CLASS?

    The Court has provisionally certified, for purposes of effectuating the Settlement only, a class consisting of: all persons or entities that purchased Alum in the United States directly from a Defendant from January 1, 1997 through February 28, 2011. Generally, you are included in the Direct Purchaser Settlement Class if you purchased Alum directly from a Defendant during this period.

    Excluded from the Direct Purchaser Settlement Class are (1) Defendants and their respective parents, subsidiaries, and affiliates, and (2) any Direct Purchaser Settlement Class Members who timely and validly elect to be excluded from the Direct Purchaser Settlement Class.

  9. WHAT IF I AM STILL NOT SURE WHETHER I AM INCLUDED?

    If you are still not sure if you are a Direct Purchaser Settlement Class Member, you can contact the Settlement Administrator, by calling 1-855-338-6128, by emailing info@LiquidAluminumUSALCOSettlement.com, or writing to Liquid Aluminum Sulfate Antitrust Litigation – USALCO Direct Purchaser Settlement, c/o Settlement Administrator, P.O. Box 30097, Philadelphia, PA 19103. You can get free help by calling or writing Interim DPP Lead Counsel, at the phone number and address listed in FAQ 23.

  10. THE BENEFITS OF THE SETTLEMENT

  11. WHAT DO THE SETTLEMENTS PROVIDE?

    USALCO has agreed to pay $6.1 million in cash, payable in three installments over a period of two years. SII has agreed to pay $6.5 million in cash. American Securities has agreed to pay $13 million in cash.

    The Settlement Funds will be used to pay: (i) the costs of settlement administration and notice as approved by the Court; (ii) attorneys’ fees and expenses, as approved by the Court; and (iii) Case Contribution Awards to Direct Purchaser Class Plaintiffs for litigating the Action on behalf of the Direct Purchaser Settlement Class as approved by the Court. The Settlement Funds after deduction of the foregoing payments is referred to as the “Net Settlement Fund.”

  12. HOW DO I RECEIVE A PAYMENT?

    If you are a Direct Purchaser Settlement Class Member and do not exclude yourself, you may be eligible to receive a payment from the Settlement. To qualify for a payment from the Settlement, you must submit a Claim Form, available for download by clicking here or by submitting online by clicking here. Please read the instructions contained in the Claim Form carefully. You must fill out the Claim Form and include all the information the form asks for. Be sure to sign it, and mail it by first-class mail, or submit it online by clicking here, postmarked (if mailed) or received (if submitted online) no later than November 7, 2019 to:

    Liquid Aluminum Sulfate Antitrust Litigation –USALCO Direct Purchaser Settlement
    c/o Settlement Administrator
    P.O. Box 30097
    Philadelphia, PA 19103

    You may be asked to verify the accuracy of the information provided in your Claim Form. Your claim must be valid to receive money.

    If the Court approves the Settlement (see “The Court’s Fairness Hearing” on the FAQs page), the Settlement Funds will be distributed at a later date to members of the Direct Purchaser Settlement Class who submit valid Claim Forms.

    There are specialized companies that may offer to fill out and file your Claim Form in return for a percentage of the value of your claim. Before you sign a contract with one of these companies, you should examine the claim-filing process provided here and decide whether using a specialized company is worth the cost. You can always seek help free of charge from the Settlement Administrator or Interim DPP Lead Counsel.

  13. HOW MUCH WILL MY PAYMENT BE?

    Direct Purchaser Settlement Class Members who file valid claims will receive their pro rata share of the Net Settlement Fund based on: (1) the Direct Purchaser Settlement Class Member’s eligible purchases of Alum; (2) the total money available to pay all claims; (3) the total dollar value of all valid claims submitted; and (4) the cost of settlement administration and notice and the Court-awarded attorneys’ fees, expenses and Case Contribution Awards (see FAQ 16). In other words, the Net Settlement Fund shall be allocated on a pro rata basis based on the total dollar value of each Direct Purchaser Settlement Class Member’s eligible purchase(s) of Alum in proportion to the total dollar value of all valid claims submitted.

    Interim DPP Lead Counsel’s proposed plan for distributing the Net Settlement Fund to Direct Purchaser Settlement Class Members (“Plan of Distribution”) will be presented to the Court with its papers in support of final approval of the Settlement. Details about the proposed Plan of Distribution will be available on the Important Documents page starting no later than August 29, 2019.

    Important! Direct Purchaser Settlement Class Members who exclude themselves in accordance with FAQ 13 will not be able to share in the distribution from the Net Settlement Fund.

  14. WHEN WILL I RECEIVE A PAYMENT?

    There is no date certain for making payments from the Settlement Funds. The Net Settlement Fund will be distributed to eligible Direct Purchaser Settlement Class Members after the Court grants final approval to the Settlement, all claims have been fully processed by the Settlement Administrator and the Court has authorized distribution of the Net Settlement Fund. Updates on this process will be made available on the Home page of this website.

    Please Note: The Settlement may be terminated on several grounds, including if the Court does not approve or materially modifies the Settlement. Should the Settlement be terminated, the Settlement Funds less the cost of settlement administration and notice will be returned to USALCO, SII, and American Securities and this Action will proceed against USALCO, SII, and American Securities as if the Settlement had not been reached. If the Settlement is terminated, there will be no payments made to Direct Purchaser Settlement Class Members.

  15. WHAT AM I GIVING UP TO RECEIVE A PAYMENT?

    Unless you exclude yourself, you will remain in the Direct Purchaser Settlement Class, and that means that you cannot sue, continue to sue, or be part of any other lawsuit against USALCO, SII or American Securities about the legal issues in this case. It also means that all of the Court’s orders will apply to you and legally bind you. As set forth in paragraphs 14 of the Settlement Agreements:

    Release: Upon Final Judgment and in consideration of payment of the Settlement Funds into the Direct Purchaser Escrow Account, and for other valuable consideration, the USALCO Released Parties1, the SII Released Parties2 and the American Securities Released Parties3 shall be completely released, acquitted, and forever discharged from any and all claims, demands, actions, suits, causes of action, whether class, individual, or otherwise in nature (whether or not any Direct Purchaser Settlement Class Member has objected to the Settlements or makes a claim upon or participates in the Settlement Funds, whether directly, representatively, derivatively or in any other capacity) that the Releasing Parties4 ever had, now has, or hereafter can, shall, or may ever have, that exist as of the date of Final Judgment, on account of, or in any way arising out of, any and all known and unknown, foreseen and unforeseen, suspected or unsuspected, actual or contingent, liquidated or unliquidated claims, injuries, damages, and the consequences thereof in any way arising out of or relating in any way to the facts and circumstances alleged in the Consolidated Proceedings (“Released Claims”), provided however, that nothing herein shall release claims involving any negligence, personal injury, breach of contract or product warranty, bailment, failure to deliver lost goods, damaged or delayed goods, product defect, securities or similar claim relating to Alum. During the period after the expiration of the deadline for submitting an opt-out notice, as determined by the Court, and prior to Final Judgment, all Releasing Parties shall be preliminarily enjoined and barred from asserting any Released Claims against the USALCO Released Parties, SII Released Parties or the American Securities Released Parties. The USALCO Released Parties, SII Released Parties and American Securities Released Parties further agree that they will not file any suit against the Releasing Parties and their current and former, direct and indirect, parents, subsidiaries, affiliates, directors, officers, shareholders, and employees arising out of or relating to the Released Claims. The release of the Released Claims will become effective as to all Releasing Parties upon Final Judgment. Upon Final Judgment, the Releasing Parties further agree that they will not file any other suit against the USALCO Released Parties, the SII Released Parties or the American Securities Released Parties arising out of or relating to the Released Claims5.

    Further Release: In addition to the provisions of Paragraphs 14, the Releasing Parties expressly waive and release, solely with respect to the Released Claims, upon Final Judgment, any and all provisions, rights, and benefits conferred by Section 1542 of the California Civil Code, which states:

    CERTAIN CLAIMS NOT AFFECTED BY GENERAL RELEASE. A GENERAL RELEASE DOES NOT EXTEND TO CLAIMS WHICH THE CREDITOR DOES NOT KNOW OR SUSPECT TO EXIST IN HIS OR HER FAVOR AT THE TIME OF EXECUTING THE RELEASE, WHICH IF KNOWN BY HIM OR HER MUST HAVE MATERIALLY AFFECTED HIS OR HER SETTLEMENT WITH THE DEBTOR;

    or by any law of any state or territory of the United States, or principle of common law, which is similar, comparable, or equivalent to Section 1542 of the California Civil Code. Each Releasing Party may hereafter discover facts other than or different from those which he, she, or it knows or believes to be true with respect to the claims which are released pursuant to the provisions of Paragraphs 15 and 16, but each Releasing Party hereby expressly waives and fully, finally, and forever settles and releases, upon Final Judgment, any known or unknown, suspected or unsuspected, contingent or non-contingent claim that the Releasing Parties have agreed to release pursuant to Paragraphs 14, whether or not concealed or hidden, without regard to the subsequent discovery or existence of such different or additional facts.

    Reservation of Claims. The Parties intend by the Settlement Agreements to release only the USALCO Released Parties, the SII Released Parties and the American Securities Released Parties, respectively, with regard to the Released Claims. The Parties specifically do not intend the Settlement Agreements, or any part thereof or any other aspect of the proposed Settlements, to compromise or otherwise affect in any way any rights the Releasing Parties have or may have against any other person, firm, association, or corporation whatsoever, including, but not limited to the Non-Settling Defendants. The release set forth in Paragraphs 14 and 15 of the Settlement Agreements is not intended to and shall not release any claims other than the Released Claims. The sales of Alum by USALCO, SII and American Securities in the United States from January 1, 1997 through February 28, 2011 shall remain in the cases against the Non-Settling Defendants in the Consolidated Proceedings as a basis for damage claims and shall be part of any joint and several liability claims against Non-Settling Defendants in the Consolidated Proceedings or other persons or entities other than the USALCO Released Parties the SII Released Parties and/or the American Securities Released Parties.

    1. The “USALCO Released Parties” are USALCO, its predecessors or assigns, and their current and former, direct and indirect parents, subsidiaries, affiliates, and all of their directors, officers, managers, members, agents, representatives and employees. As used in this Paragraph, “affiliates” means entities controlling, controlled, in whole or in part, by or under common ownership or control with, in whole or in part, USALCO or its predecessors.

    2. The “SII Released Parties” are SII, its predecessors; its current and former, direct and indirect parents, subsidiaries and affiliates; its present and former shareholders (including Milton Sundbeck, who is a Defendant in the Consolidated Proceedings), partners, directors, officers, owners of any kind, principals, members, agents, employees, contractors, attorneys, heirs, executors, administrators, devisees, and representatives. As used in this Paragraph, “affiliates” means entities controlling, controlled by or under common ownership or control with, in whole or in part, any of the SII Released Parties.

    3. “American Securities Released Parties” means (a) American Securities, its former and current parents, subsidiaries and affiliates; and b) any of their respective current and former, direct or indirect, directors, officers, managers, attorneys, equity holders, agents, and employees, including without limitation, Matthew LeBaron and Scott Wolff, who were named as Defendants in the Litigation, provided however, that excluded from the American Securities Released Parties are any current defendants in the Consolidated Proceedings to the extent named as defendants by the Direct Purchaser Class Plaintiffs, other than American Securities, LLC, Matthew LeBaron and Scott Wolff.

    4. “Releasing Party” or “Releasing Parties” refers individually and collectively, to the Direct Purchaser Settlement Class and all Direct Purchaser Settlement Class Members, including the Direct Purchaser Class Plaintiffs and the Direct Action Direct Purchaser Settlement Class Members, each on behalf of themselves and their respective predecessors and successors; their current and former, direct and indirect parents, subsidiaries and affiliates; their present and former shareholders, partners, directors, officers, owners of any kind, principals, members, agents, employees, contractors, attorneys, insurers, heirs, executors, administrators, devisees, representatives; their assigns of all such persons or entities, as well as any person or entity acting on behalf of or through any of them in any capacity whatsoever, jointly and severally; and any of their past, present and future agents, officials acting in their official capacities, legal representatives, agencies, departments, commissions and divisions; and also means, to the full extent of the power of the signatories hereto to release past, present and future claims, the following: (1) any Releasing Party’s subdivisions (political or otherwise, including, but not limited to, municipalities, counties, parishes, villages, unincorporated districts and hospital districts), public entities, public instrumentalities and public education institutions; and (2) persons or entities acting in a parens patriae, sovereign, quasi-sovereign, private attorney general, qui tam, taxpayer or any other capacity, whether or not any of them participate in the Settlements. As used in this Paragraph, “affiliates” means entities controlling, controlled by or under common ownership or control with, in whole or in part, any of the Releasing Parties.

    5. The releases in the Settlement Agreements have slight variations. Please refer to the Settlement Agreements for exact language regarding the releases.

  16. EXCLUDING YOURSELF FROM THE DIRECT PURCHASER SETTLEMENT CLASS

    If you want to keep the right to sue or continue to sue USALCO, SII and/or American Securities on your own about the legal issues being resolved by the Settlements, then you must take steps to get out of the Direct Purchaser Settlement Class. This is called excluding yourself - or sometimes referred to as “opting out.” If you opt out of the Direct Purchaser Settlement Class, you will not receive any payment from the Net Settlement Fund.

  17. HOW DO I GET OUT OF THE DIRECT PURCHASER SETTLEMENT CLASS?

    To exclude yourself, you must send a letter saying that you want to be excluded from the Direct Purchaser Settlement Class. The letter must include the following information: (i) a statement indicating that you want to be excluded from the Direct Purchaser Settlement Class in In Re: Liquid Aluminum Sulfate Antitrust Litigation, Civil Action No. 16-md-2687 (JLL) (JAD); (ii) your name, address, telephone number, and your signature; and (iii) all trade names or business names and all addresses (including any addresses that have received shipments of Alum from a Defendant) you or your business have used, as well as any subsidiaries or affiliates who are requesting to be excluded from the Direct Purchaser Settlement Class. Your letter must be postmarked by July 26, 2019 and sent to:

    Class Action Opt Out
    Attn: Liquid Aluminum Sulfate Antitrust Litigation – USALCO Direct Purchaser Settlement
    P.O. Box 30097
    Philadelphia, PA 19103

    If you ask to be excluded, you will not get any payment from the Net Settlement Fund created by the Settlement and you cannot object to the Settlement. If you want to receive a payment from the Settlement, do not exclude yourself.

    Important - Please Note: Unless you exclude yourself, if the Court approves the Settlement, you give up any right to sue USALCO, SII, and American Securities for the claims that the Settlement resolves. If you have a pending lawsuit against USALCO, SII, and American Securities involving the same legal issues in this case, speak to your lawyer in that case immediately. You must exclude yourself from the Direct Purchaser Settlement Class in order to continue your own lawsuit against USALCO, SII, and American Securities.

    Warning! If your letter is sent after the deadline, your request for exclusion will be considered invalid and you will not be excluded from the Direct Purchaser Settlement Class. You cannot exclude yourself by telephone or email.

  18. IF I EXCLUDE MYSELF, CAN I RECEIVE MONEY FROM THE SETTLEMENT?

    No. If you decide to exclude yourself from the Direct Purchaser Settlement Class, you will not be able to receive money from the Settlement.

  19. THE LAWYERS REPRESENTING YOU

  20. DO I HAVE A LAWYER IN THIS CASE?

    Yes. The Court appointed James E. Cecchi, Esq. of Carella, Byrne, Cecchi, Olstein, Brody & Agnello, P.C. as Interim DPP Lead Counsel to represent the Direct Purchaser Settlement Class on an interim basis and for purposes of the Settlement.

    If you want to be represented by your own lawyer and have that lawyer appear in court for you concerning the Settlement, you may hire one at your own expense. If you hire your own lawyer, you must tell the Court and send a copy of your notice to Interim DPP Lead Counsel at the address set forth in FAQ 17.

  21. HOW WILL THE LAWYERS BE PAID?

    You are not personally responsible for payment of attorneys’ fees or expenses. Interim DPP Lead Counsel will seek an award of attorneys’ fees up to 33.3% of the total consideration made available to the Direct Purchaser Settlement Class to compensate all of the lawyers and their law firms that have worked on this Action since its inception. Interim DPP Lead Counsel will also seek reimbursement of the costs and expenses advanced on behalf of the Direct Purchaser Settlement Class. If the Court approves Interim DPP Lead Counsel’s requests, these amounts will be deducted from the Settlement Funds.

    Interim DPP Lead Counsel will also seek Case Contribution Awards of no more than $40,000 for each of the Direct Purchaser Class Plaintiffs who served as proposed class representatives while the case was pending. If awarded, these amounts will also be deducted from the Settlement Funds.

    Important! Interim DPP Lead Counsel’s request for attorneys’ fees, expenses and Case Contribution Awards will be on file with the Court, and available for review on the Important Documents page by August 29, 2019.

  22. OBJECTING TO THE SETTLEMENTS, THE PLAN OF DISTRIBUTION AND/OR THE REQUEST FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES, EXPENSES AND CASE CONTRIBUTION AWARDS

  23. HOW DO I TELL THE COURT THAT I DON’T LIKE THE SETTLEMENT, PLAN OF DISTRIBUTION AND/OR THE REQUEST FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES, EXPENSES OR CASE CONTRIBUTION AWARDS?

    If you are a Direct Purchaser Settlement Class Member (and have not excluded yourself), you may tell the Court that you object to (or disagree with) all or part of the Settlement, Plan of Distribution, and/or Interim DPP Lead Counsel’s request for an award of attorneys’ fees, reimbursement of expenses, and/or Case Contribution Awards to Direct Purchaser Class Plaintiffs. You must give reasons for your objection(s). The Court will consider your objections when it decides whether or not to finally approve the Settlement.

    Your written objection must include the following: (i) a statement indicating that you object to the Settlement, the Plan of Distribution and/or the request for attorneys’ fees, expenses, or Case Contribution Awards, in In Re: Liquid Aluminum Sulfate Antitrust Litigation, Civil Action No. 16-md-2687 (JLL) (JAD); (ii) your name, address, telephone number, and your signature; (iii) the reasons you object and all documents and writings that you want the Court to consider; and (iv) proof of your membership in the Direct Purchaser Settlement Class, such as invoices showing that you satisfy the definition in FAQ 6. If you intend to appear at the final fairness hearing, you must also include a notice of intention to appear (see FAQ 21).

    To object, you must file your written objection(s) with the Court at the following address by September 12, 2019:

    Clerk of Court
    Martin Luther King, Jr. Building & U.S. Courthouse
    50 Walnut Street
    Newark, NJ 07101

    You must also send a copy of your written objection(s) to Interim DPP Lead Counsel and Counsel for USALCO, SII and/or American Securities, as appropriate, at the following addresses by September 12, 2019:

    Interim DPP Lead Counsel
    James E. Cecchi, Esq.
    Carella, Byrne, Cecchi, Olstein, Brody
    & Agnello, P.C.
    5 Becker Farm Road
    Roseland, NJ 07068

    Counsel for SII
    John S. Mairo
    William Hughes
    Kelly D. Curtin
    Porzio, Bromberg & Newman, P.C.
    100 Southgate Parkway
    Morristown, NJ 07962

    Counsel for USALCO
    William F. Ryan, Jr.
    Aaron L. Casagrande
    Whiteford, Taylor & Preston L.L.P.
    7 Saint Paul Street
    Baltimore, Maryland 21202

    Counsel for American Securities
    Aaron Rubinstein and Scott Lent
    Arnold & Porter Kay Scholer LLP
    250 West 55th Street
    New York, New York 10019

  24. WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN OBJECTING AND EXCLUDING?

    Objecting is simply telling the Court that you do not like something about the Settlement. You can object to the Settlement only if you stay in the Direct Purchaser Settlement Class. Excluding yourself, or “opting out,” means that you are removing yourself from the Direct Purchaser Settlement Class and will have no right to proceeds from the Settlement. If you exclude yourself, you also have no right to object to the Settlement, because the Settlement no longer affects you.

  25. THE COURT’S FAIRNESS HEARING

  26. WHEN AND WHERE WILL THE COURT DECIDE WHETHER TO APPROVE THE SETTLEMENT?

    The Court will hold a Fairness Hearing at 2:00 p.m. on September 26, 2019, at the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey, Martin Luther King Building & U.S. Courthouse, 50 Walnut Street, Newark, NJ 07101. At the Fairness Hearing, the Court will consider whether the Settlement is fair, reasonable, and adequate and whether to approve the Plan of Distribution and the request for attorneys’ fees, expenses, and Case Contribution Awards. The Court will listen to Direct Purchaser Settlement Class Members who have asked to speak at the hearing. If there are objections or comments, the Court will consider them at that time. After the hearing, the Court will decide whether to approve the Settlement, the Plan of Distribution, and the request for attorneys’ fees, expenses, and Case Contribution Awards. We do not know how long a decision will take to be made.

    Important! The time and date of the Fairness Hearing may change without additional mailed or publication notice. For updated information on the Fairness Hearing, please check back to this Settlement Website.

  27. DO I HAVE TO COME TO THE HEARING?

    No. Interim DPP Lead Counsel will be prepared to answer any questions the Court may have at the Fairness Hearing. However, you are welcome to attend the hearing at your own expense. If you send an objection, you do not have to come to court to explain your objection. As long as you mailed your written objection on time as set out in the Notice, the Court will consider it. You may also pay another lawyer to attend the hearing, but it is not required.

  28. MAY I SPEAK AT THE HEARING?

    You may ask the Court for permission to speak at the Fairness Hearing. If you wish to do so, you must file a Notice of Intention to Appear with the Court at the following address by September 12, 2019:

    Clerk of Court
    Martin Luther King Building & U.S. Courthouse
    50 Walnut Street
    Newark, NJ 07101

    You must also mail copies of the Notice of Intention to Appear to the attorneys listed in FAQ 17, no later than September 12, 2019.

    Your Notice of Intention to Appear must include (i) the case caption, In Re: Liquid Aluminum Sulfate Antitrust Litigation, Civil Action No. 16-md-2687 (JLL) (JAD); (ii) your name, address, and telephone number, and (iii) personal information for other people (including lawyers) who want to speak at the hearing.

  29. IF YOU DO NOTHING

  30. WHAT HAPPENS IF I DO NOTHING AT ALL?

    If you do nothing, you will remain in the Direct Purchaser Settlement Class, and you will be bound by the terms of the Settlements and will forego any right to sue, or be part of any other lawsuit against USALCO, SII or American Securities over the “Released Claims.”

    If you remain in the Direct Purchaser Settlement Class, to qualify for a payment from the Settlement you must submit a Claim Form, available for download by clicking here or submit online by clicking here. See FAQ 9.

  31. GETTING MORE INFORMATION

  32. WHERE CAN I GET MORE INFORMATION?

    The Notice summarizes the Settlement. More details are in the Settlement Agreements. You can review the Settlement Agreements and other documents related to the Action by visiting the Important Documents page. In addition, Interim DPP Lead Counsel’s motions for final approval of the Settlement, Plan of Distribution and request for attorneys’ fees, expenses, and Case Contribution Awards are currently due to be filed with the Court by March 22, 2019 and will be available for review on this Settlement Website.

    If you have questions or want more information, you may contact the Settlement Administrator at Liquid Aluminum Sulfate Antitrust Litigation – USALCO Direct Purchaser Settlement, c/o Settlement Administrator, P.O. Box 30097, Philadelphia, PA 19103; 1-855-338-6128. You can also contact Interim DPP Lead Counsel, James E. Cecchi, Esq., Carella, Byrne, Cecchi, Olstein, Brody & Agnello, P.C., 5 Becker Farm Road, Roseland, NJ 07068; 973-994-1700.


GETTING MORE INFORMATION

The Notice summarizes the Settlement. More details are in the Settlement Agreement. You can review the Settlement Agreement and other documents related to the Action by clicking here. In addition, Interim DPP Lead Counsel’s motions for final approval of the Settlement, Plan of Distribution and request for attorneys’ fees, expenses, and Case Contribution Awards are currently due to be filed with the Court by October 17, 2019 and will be available for review on the website.

If you have questions or want more information, you may contact the Settlement Administrator at Liquid Aluminum Sulfate Antitrust Litigation – C&S Direct Purchaser Settlements, c/o Settlement Administrator, P.O. Box 30097, Philadelphia, PA 19103; 1-855-338-6128. You can also contact Interim DPP Lead Counsel, James E. Cecchi, Esq., Carella, Byrne, Cecchi, Olstein, Brody & Agnello, P.C., 5 Becker Farm Road, Roseland, NJ 07068; 973-994-1700.

PLEASE DO NOT WRITE OR CALL THE COURT OR THE CLERK’S OFFICE FOR INFORMATION.